• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH UNKNOWN BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Failure to Eject (4010)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown bone cement/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number and 510-k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: kim.C.H.Et al.(2021), efficacy of antibiotic-loaded cement augmentation for correcting low grade pedicle screw loosening, korean journal of neurotrauma, vol.17(1), pages 41-47 (south korea).This study aimed to assess the results of percutaneous fluoroscopy-guided antibiotic-loaded cement augmentation for the correction of clinically relevant screw loosening, a common challenge in the wide usage of pedicle screw fixation.Between june 2016 and july 2018, 10 patients who subsequently experienced symptomatic low-grade pedicle screw loosening underwent percutaneous cement augmentation.There were 4 males and 6 females with a mean patient age were 66.9 years (range, 56¿78 years), and the mean follow-up period was 8.8 months (range, 6¿12 months).The implant used was an antibiotic-loaded bone cement consists of 2 components-a powder and a-that were mixed before use (cmw-g; depuy synthes, raynham, ma, usa).The following complications were reported as follows: case 2: a (b)(6) year-old male patient had implant-related obscurity of the fluoroscopic landmarks, and cement filling was not successful into the halo.He was treated with percutaneous screw re-implantation via a different trajectory in the end.This report is for an unknown synthes bone cement.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN BIOMATERIAL - CEMENT
Type of Device
POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INT SPINE
chemin blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ   02400
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key12558252
MDR Text Key274336774
Report Number1526439-2021-02092
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/01/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/30/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/01/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age67 YR
-
-