|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Reporter is a j&j employee.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the complaint device single innie inserter (product code: 279702000, lot number: gm4056101) was returned to cq west chester for investigation.During visual inspection, the tip of the driver was found stripped and the item showed wear consistent with usage of the device.Functional test: a functional test could not be performed as the device was not returned with a mating device.The complaint cannot be replicated as a functional test was not performed.Dimensional inspection: a dimensional inspection was not performed as this is found to be a post manufacturing issue.Document/specification review: based on the date of manufacture, the current and manufactured version of drawing were reviewed.Complaint confirmed: the complaint condition can be confirmed as the driver tip was found stripped which could have led to the difficulty in assembling using the device.Conclusion: the driver tip was damaged which could have caused the issue in assembling during the procedure.Hence, the complaint is being confirmed.A definitive assignable root cause could not be determined from the available information.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.H6: a review of the receiving inspection (ri) for single innie inserter was conducted identifying that lot number gm4056101 was released in two batches.Batch: lot qty of 9 units were released on (b)(6) 2014 with no discrepancies.Batch: lot qty of 191 units were released on (b)(6) 2014 with no discrepancies.As a result, the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|