• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GUIDE CATHETER; PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GUIDE CATHETER; PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKENVOY
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891)
Event Date 08/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Literature article citation: "comparison of micro-clamping stent-retriever thrombectomy with conventional stent-retriever thrombectomy in intracranial large vessel embolism" reviewed.Liu, z.S., deng, g., zhou, l.J., sun, y., zhang, x.J., kuang, x.W., qin, y.L., wang, j.X., & shan, q.(2018).World neurosurgery , 116 , e662¿e669.Https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Wneu.2018.05.066 device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Literature article "comparison of micro-clamping stent-retriever thrombectomy with conventional stent-retriever thrombectomy in intracranial large vessel embolism" reviewed.Liu, z.S., deng, g., zhou, l.J., sun, y., zhang, x.J., kuang, x.W., qin, y.L., wang, j.X., & shan, q.(2018).World neurosurgery , 116 , e662¿e669.Https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Wneu.2018.05.066 objective and methods: to evaluate the effectiveness of microclamping stent-retriever thrombectomy (msrt) in patients with acute ischemic stroke with intracranial large vessel embolism (ilve), and compare it with that of conventional stent-retriever thrombectomy (csrt).We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients with ilva treated by msrt (n [ 52) or csrt (n [ 56) from the 2 participating institutions between january 2016 and november 2017.The rates of successful (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [mtici] grade 2b or 3) and complete reperfusion (mtici grade 3), time from guide catheter placement to reperfusion, rates of first-pass success, and the number of passes for reperfusion were compared between the msrt and csrt groups.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected cerenovus device possibly associated with reported adverse events: envoy catheter other cerenovus devices that were also used in this study: n/a.Non-cerenovus devices that were also used in this study: n/a.Adverse event(s) and provided interventions: 11 patients experienced subarachnoid hemorrhage post-operatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) under mrn 3008264254-2021-00039 is being retracted.The report was submitted in error.Retraction of initial report (b)(4) under mrn 3008264254-2021-00039.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUIDE CATHETER
Type of Device
PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle nechatel CH240 0
SZ  CH2400
MDR Report Key12573825
MDR Text Key282288259
Report Number3008264254-2021-00039
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K000715
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKENVOY
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/10/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/04/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/07/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/09/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-