| Catalog Number |
338.27 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Key or Button Unresponsive/not Working (4063)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/14/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No sample has been received by manufacturing for evaluation.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A physician reported that an ophthalmic scraper control button would not operate which prevented the nitinol loop from extending during retinal surgery thus, preventing the device from scraping properly.An alternate scraper was obtained in order to complete the procedure.There was no harm to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record (dhr) traceable to the reported lot number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.Sample was not received by the investigation site for evaluation.The root cause cannot be identified conclusively because no picture or sample has been received.Investigation has been completed based on current information.Should sample returned, this file will be re-opened and failure analysis will be performed.This complaint has been reviewed and future data will be monitored for evidence of adverse trending and further action will be taken, as appropriate.At a minimum, this will include completing reviews of complaint class report levels on a monthly basis.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation is completed.Customer reported finesse loop control button was not working properly.A review of the device history record (dhr) traceable to the reported lot number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.The sample is received with inner blister, outer blister and cover foil showing the lot information.The sample shows no macroscopic signs of damage.The sample shows no signs of surgery residues the sample was visually inspected with the aid of a photomicroscope with various magnifications.The sample was functionally inspected.The customer¿s complaint was not confirmed.It was found that the control button of the device was working.No loop was present (also see microscopic images prior to cleaning).When the loop disappeared can no longer be determined.The root cause cannot be identified conclusively because the sample has pass the 100% inspection.The sample was received in a closed status.As the blister was opened by the customer, he handled the product.The point in time when the malfunction occurred, can no longer be determent.This complaint has been reviewed and future data will be monitored for evidence of adverse trending and further action will be taken, as appropriate.At a minimum, this will include completing reviews of complaint class report levels on a monthly basis.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|