|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat the diagonal coronary artery.The pilot 50 guide wire was used and during use the guide wire caused a perforation to the vessel.A stent was placed to treat the perforation; however, the perforation resulted in a pericardial effusion which was drained.The patient at this time was transferred to another hospital for further treatment and the vessel was coiled to treat the perforation.The coiling of the perforation caused in-stent thrombosis and the patient had a stroke.Ultimately, the patient expired but it is not known when.No additional information was provided.
|
|
There was no reported device malfunction, and the product was not returned.A review of the electronic lot history record (elhr), corrective action tracking system for the web (catsweb) database review query for this product was not performed since the lot number was not reported and the product was not returned for analysis.The reported patient effect of perforation is listed in the electronic instructions for use (ifu) for guide wire hi-torque pilot, ptca/pta/stents, cto, ce/fda as a known patient effect of the procedure.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effects and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.Additionally, the reported treatment appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.A medical review of the complaint was reviewed by an abbott vascular clinical specialist who concluded the following: this was reported as a case to treat a diagonal coronary artery in a patient of an unknown age with an unknown medical history.It was reported that the procedure was performed around a year and half (1.5 years) ago.The exact date was unreported.Reportedly, during the procedure an abbott ht pilot 50 was used and reportedly the guidewire caused a perforation to the vessel, the information provided is not clear on which vessel was perforated.The artery was stented with an unknown stent.The perforation reportedly caused a pericardial effusion, which was drained.Per the abbott ht pilot guidewire ifu, perforation is a known risk of use.The patient was reportedly transferred to another hospital for further treatment of the perforation.Reportedly, the vessel was embolized with coils to treat the perforation.This led to in-stent thrombosis and it was reported that the patient had a stroke.Unfortunately, it was reported that the patient expired at some point in the last year and a half, the exact date of the death was not reported.However, the information provided is severely limited and it is not clear which coronary vessel was embolized with coils.Additional information and/or cine images of the coil embolization procedure would help clarify the target vessel and what happened during both procedures.The probable cause of the stroke was the use of coils to embolize the perforated artery, which was stented during the initial procedure.The coil embolization caused the occlusion of the reported vessel, as is the intended purpose of a coil embolization procedure.Information regarding either procedure was not provided, however it is likely that anti-coagulation medications were suspended for the coil embolization procedure, which also would have increased the risk of stroke and death for this patient.Due to the fact that the cause of death was not reported, nor was the date, it cannot be definitely stated that the ht pilot 50 was a direct cause of this patient¿s death.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effects and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.Additionally, the reported treatments appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|