Model Number G125 |
Device Problems
No Audible Alarm (1019); Failure to Capture (1081); Failure to Read Input Signal (1581); Telemetry Discrepancy (1629)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/26/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been returned for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of analysis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient underwent a scheduled device replacement procedure for normal battery depletion.This cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) device was implanted as the replacement device.However after pocket closure, telemetry connection to this device was lost when the physician was using electrocautery near the pocket.The device was unable to be interrogated using two different model programmers and subsequently received an out of range telemetry status.The boston scientific representative noted that they were able to easily interrogate the explanted device.The representative stated that one of the leads connected to the implanted device exhibited a downward deflection appearance but then the deflection changed to an upward appearance and the lower rate limit was 50 beats per minute.They also noted that the sinus rate is 60 beats per minute and they could not confirm if there was capture.Boston scientific technical services (ts) provided troubleshooting guidance to place a magnet over the device and the representative indicated there were no device tones as would be expected.The representative stated that the device had been taken out of storage mode.Ts indicated that this may not be a functioning device.The pocket was then reopened, the crt-d device was explanted and a new crt-d device of the same model number was successful implanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been returned for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of analysis.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, a thorough evaluation of the product was performed.The device had no telemetry upon return.Engineering calculations confirmed the longevity of this device was not as expected.The device case was opened.An external power supply was connected to the device and the electrical current was monitored.During the monitoring process a high current condition was observed.It was then concluded that the cause of the reported allegations is a depleted battery caused by electrical overstress damage to the mixed-mode integrated circuits which caused an extremely high current drain, depleting the battery.The observed damage is not deemed to indicate product defect or malfunction, but likely occurred during normal use of the product.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient underwent a scheduled device replacement procedure for normal battery depletion.This cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) device was implanted as the replacement device.However after pocket closure, telemetry connection to this device was lost when the physician was using electrocautery near the pocket.The device was unable to be interrogated using two different model programmers and subsequently received an out of range telemetry status.The boston scientific representative noted that they were able to easily interrogate the explanted device.The representative stated that one of the leads connected to the implanted device exhibited a downward deflection appearance but then the deflection changed to an upward appearance and the lower rate limit was 50 beats per minute.They also noted that the sinus rate is 60 beats per minute and they could not confirm if there was capture.Boston scientific technical services (ts) provided troubleshooting guidance to place a magnet over the device and the representative indicated there were no device tones as would be expected.The representative stated that the device had been taken out of storage mode.Ts indicated that this may not be a funcitioning device.The pocket was then reopened, the crt-d device was explanted and a new crt-d device of the same model number was successful implanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|