C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 HICKMAN PORT SINGLE LUMEN; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 0603880C |
Device Problems
Restricted Flow rate (1248); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
Patient Problem
Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
Event Date 08/31/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f are identified.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Expiry date: 08/2023.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the six days post port placement in the right internal jugular vein, the port allegedly had low flow rate during infusion.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced swelling in the neck and chest.The port was removed from the right chest wall under local anesthesia.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided for review.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported restricted flow rate issue as the exact circumstances at the time of reported event was unknown and cannot be confirmed from the provided photo review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2023), g3, h6 (method).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the six days post port placement in the right internal jugular vein, the port allegedly had low flow rate during infusion.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced swelling in the neck and chest.The port was removed from the right chest wall under local anesthesia.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided for review.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported restricted flow rate and fluid leak issues as the exact circumstances at the time of reported event was unknown and cannot be confirmed from the provided photo review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2023), g3, h6 (device, method).H11: d6 (medical device explant date).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the six days post port placement in the right internal jugular vein, the port allegedly had low flow rate during infusion.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced swelling in the neck and chest.The port was removed from the right chest wall under local anesthesia.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|