• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC PERFORMER INTRODUCER; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G07337
Medical Device Problem Codes Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Deformation (2976); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/27/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510k #: preamendment.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) and using a performer introducer, the tip of the sheath was damaged.The puncture site was the common femoral artery, and the target site was the superior femoral artery.There was difficulty noted during advancement/insertion, and the device did make patient contact.After the tip damage was discovered, they used another lot of the same device to complete the procedure, and there as no usage issues.No tortuous, scarred, or calcified anatomy was noted.No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, during a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta), the tip of a performer introducer became damaged.The puncture site was the common femoral artery, and the target site was the superior femoral artery.There was difficulty noted during advancement/insertion.After the tip damage was discovered, they used another lot of the same device to complete the procedure, and there were no usage issues.No tortuous, scarred, or calcified anatomy was noted.No unintended section of the device remained inside of the patient's body.No additional procedures were required due to the occurrence.No adverse effects were reported due to this occurrence.Upon return and evaluation of the device, the tip of the sheath was noted to be split.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The used complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The distal tip was split.Sharp edges were not noted.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to this incident.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
Upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the tip was noted to be split.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERFORMER INTRODUCER
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC.
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key12631376
Report Number1820334-2021-02322
Device Sequence Number15665024
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002073371
UDI-Public(01)00827002073371(17)240222(10)13686085
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/11/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/22/2024
Device Model NumberG07337
Device Catalogue NumberRCF-6.0-38-J
Device Lot Number13686085
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/29/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/28/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/29/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/14/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/11/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/22/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
0.038 INCH WIRE; 0.038 INCH WIRE.
Patient SexUnknown
-
-