|
The lot number, manufacture date and, expiration date were obtained through a review of the surgical history previously provided by the physician.Investigation summary: based on the information available, the cause that contributed to the reported perforation cannot be established as the product is not available for analysis.Device history record (dhr): the dhr confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.Device technical analysis: the device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Labeling review: a review of the app instructions for use (ifu) was completed and did not reveal any evidence of device misuse, off label use, or failure to follow instructions.Investigation conclusion: based on the information available, a conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.
|