| Model Number |
PCB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Age, weight, and ethnicity: unknown, information not provided.Date of event: unknown, not provided.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the surgeon noticed some damage to the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) once implanted into patient's operative eye.The surgeon had to cut out the lens during the same procedure and replaced with a new lens.No other intervention was required.No further information was available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed since the product was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the reported issue could not be verified, and product quality deficiency could not be determined.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search revealed that one additional complaint was received from this production order, however, is not related to this issue.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: nov 30, 2021.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during removal.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|