|
It was reported that during endoscopic ear surgery, outside the patient, the camera head had a problem with the monitor.The procedure was successfully completed with a delay greater than 30min using a competitor device(spies camera).No further complications reported.
|
|
H3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Factors, unrelated to the manufacturing and design of the device that could have contributed to the reported event, include issues with a concomitant device.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future occurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.
|