| Catalog Number |
1191530 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
09/30/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As reported, the patient underwent a procedure due to pancreatic cancer and at that time was implanted with a phasix mesh.Following surgery, the patient was diagnosed with bowel obstruction.The clinician has assessed the patient¿s postoperative course as being ¿definitely¿ related to the study device, however, based on the information provided, no conclusion can be made.Review of manufacturing records shows the product was manufactured to specification, with no indication of a manufacturing related cause for the event reported.Should additional information be provided a supplemental mdr will be submitted.Not returned.Remains implanted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to davol that a patient who is part of a clinical study experienced bowel obstruction post implant of the phasix mesh.On (b)(6) 2021, the subject patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy to perform a whipple procedure (pancreaticduodenectomy) due to a medical history significant for cancer (malignant neoplasm of head of pancreas).During this procedure a bard/davol phasix mesh was placed in an onlay fashion and mechanical fixation (non-bard/davol) was achieved to secure the mesh.A cholecystectomy was also performed at this time.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was discharged from the hospital to home with nursing care.(b)(6) 2021, the patient presented to the emergency department and was diagnosed with bowel obstruction.As reported, the reported ae of bowel obstruction has been assessed per the clinician as definitely related to the study device and not related to the index procedure and moderate in severity.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As reported, the patient underwent a procedure due to pancreatic cancer and at that time was implanted with a phasix mesh.Following surgery, the patient was diagnosed with bowel obstruction.The clinician has assessed the patient¿s postoperative course as being ¿definitely¿ related to the study device, however, based on the information provided, no conclusion can be made.Review of manufacturing records shows the product was manufactured to specification, with no indication of a manufacturing related cause for the event reported.Addendum: this is an addendum to the initial mdr submitted.This supplemental mdr is submitted to document the additional information provided.Based on the received information, the reported ae of bowel obstruction has been assessed per the clinician as not related to the study device and definitely related to the procedure.Updated fields: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to davol that a patient who is part of a clinical study experienced bowel obstruction post implant of the phasix mesh.(b)(6) 2021 - the subject patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy to perform a whipple procedure (pancreaticduodenectomy) due to a medical history significant for cancer (malignant neoplasm of head of pancreas).During this procedure a bard/davol phasix mesh was placed in an onlay fashion and mechanical fixation (non-bard/davol) was achieved to secure the mesh.A cholecystectomy was also performed at this time.(b)(6) 2021 - the patient was discharged from the hospital to home with nursing care.(b)(6) 2021 - the patient presented to the emergency department and was diagnosed with bowel obstruction.As reported, the reported ae of bowel obstruction has been assessed per the clinician as definitely related to the study device and not related to the index procedure and moderate in severity.Addendum: the reported ae of bowel obstruction has been assessed per the clinician as not related to the study device and definitely related to the procedure.The ae has been assessed as moderate in severity and also assessed to meet the definition of a sae (serious adverse event).The reported ae does not meet the definition of a uade (unanticipated adverse device event).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|