|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR CPX 4 BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER WITH SUTURE TABS; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
3549216 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Off-Label Use (1494); Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
09/23/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.A manufacturing record evaluation is in progress.Once completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: left deflation.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6)-year-old caucasian female patient underwent revision breast reconstruction with a 800cc mentor cpx 4 breast tissue expander with suture tabs and experienced expander deflation on her left side postoperatively.The patient underwent bilateral explantation and replacement with catalog number 3341457; serial number (b)(4) on the left side, and with catalog number 3341457; serial number (b)(4) on the right side on (b)(6) 2021.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2021, expander evaluation was completed.Device evaluation summary: mentor conducted a visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.During the visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the med height te w/sut tabs 800cc returned device.Leak testing was performed in accordance with mentor's procedures.Findings revealed a tear at the juncture of the shell and the posterior patch.Microscopic examination was performed and the cause of the deflation could not be identified.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On november 2, 2021, mentor received confirmation that for this patient the 1st tissue expander was placed (b)(6) 2021.Hence, after clinical/secondary review of this file performed on november 15, 2021, device problem code off-label use was added to more accurately report the off label use of expander.On november 15, 2021, device re-evaluation was completed and summarized as below: mentor conducted a visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.During the visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the med height te w/sut tabs 800cc returned device.Leak testing was performed in accordance with mentor's procedures.Findings revealed a tear at the juncture of the shell and the posterior patch.Microscopic examination was performed and the cause of the deflation could not be identified.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Based on the implantation date provided and the expiration date of the reported lot number, the compliant device was implanted after its sterility expiration date.Per the product insert data sheet, sterility cannot be guaranteed if the packaging has been damaged or after the ¿use by date¿ shown on the box label.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|