|
Product investigation information was received, and the following fields were updated accordingly: information received that came in with product return.Patient date of birth (b)(6) 1953, 68 yrs.Old, right eye.The following fields are updated.Section a-2: date of birth: (b)(6) 1953, 68 yrs.Old.Section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 12-nov-2021 section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens had been cut into three pieces, which is consistent with a lens handled during removal.A detached haptic as well as a damaged haptic were also observed.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed on the lens.The complaint issue detached haptic was confirmed; however, based on the fact that the lens was handled during removal, it cannot be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing issue.Therefore, no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed, the product was manufactured and released according to specification.No nc/er was found as part of this manufacturing records review.Historical data analysis: a search revealed that no other complaints have been received for this production order (po) number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|