(b)(4).The returned microknife xl was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the cutting wire was broken and kinked/bent on the handle section, consistent with the findings when the device was observed under magnification.It was also found that the handle area was kinked/bent.Upon destructive analysis of the device, wherein the device was torn to inspect the internal components and compared with a good condition sample, a gap was observed.Also, the cutting wire was kinked/bent on the threaded area of the hypotube.A functional evaluation was not performed due to the device condition.No other problems with the device were noted.The product analysis revealed that the cutting wire was broken at the handle section.Based on the condition of the device, the problem found could have been caused due to procedural factors encountered during procedure, affecting the device performance and integrity.It is possible that if the cutting wire was activated, there was resistance from the kinked section that was observed on the handle causing fatigue and the cutting wire to break.Additionally, the cutting wire was kinked/bent on the threaded area of the hypotube.This condition could have been generated after the manufacturing process.Based on all gathered information and since the investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported adverse event, the most probable root cause of this complaint is cause not established.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.
|