• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO 2; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO 2; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5992025
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Insufficient Information (4580)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralight st meshes on (b)(6) 2015 and (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralight st meshes on (b)(6) 2015 and (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of ventralight st using echo ps (device 1) and composix e/x (device 2).Per op notes, ¿a large hernia sac was identified and reduced.A ventralight st using echo ps (device 1) and a composix e/x (device 2) was placed and sutured using sorbafix absorbable tacks.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral incisional hernia with abdominal pain thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with excision of ventralight st using echo ps (device 1), composix e/x (device 2) and implant of ventralight st using echo ps 2 (device 3).Per op notes, ¿extensive adhesions were note and lysed.The prior mesh (device 1 and 2) identified to be rippled and folded back itself and the superior edge of mesh had come loose.The entire mesh (device 1 and 2) was excised and removed.The hernia defect was identified and reduced.A ventralight st using echo ps 2 (device 3) was placed and sutured.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the product identifiers.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2019) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b4, b5, b7, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d1 (brand name), d4, g4 (pma/510(k)).This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st w/ echo 2 (device 3).Additional supplemental emdr and emdr were submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st w/ echo 2 (device 1) and bard/davol mesh - composix e/x (device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO 2
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key12674272
Report Number1213643-2021-08255
Device Sequence Number11802701
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741131042
UDI-Public(01)00801741131042(17)200928(10)HUDX0818
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K170294
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/27/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2020
Device Catalogue Number5992025
Device Lot NumberHUDX0818
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/19/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/11/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/21/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/27/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/15/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight132 KG
-
-