BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JAGTOME RX 44; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M00573540 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Failure to Fold (1255)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/07/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the problem analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Note: this report pertains to the second of two jagtome rx 44 devices used during the same procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a jagtome rx 44 was used in the biliary during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2021.During the procedure, "the jagtome does not bend and tighten optimally." a second jagtome rx 44 was used; however, same thing happened, it did not bend and tighten optimally.Additionally, the cutting wire of the second jagtome rx 44 also broke.It was reported that no part of the cutting wire detached and fell into the patient.The procedure was not completed due to this event as they could not perform sphincterotomy and considering the procedure time.The patient was rescheduled to have another ercp procedure.The exact date of the ercp is unknown.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event and the patient outcome was reported to be fully recovered.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6 (device codes): medical device problem code a0401 captures the reportable event of cutting wire broken.Block h10: the returned jagtome rx 44 was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the distal pierced hole (tome's extrusion) was torn, which displaced the cutting wire anchor from its original position and the wire anchor was still within the catheter, consistent with the findings when the device was observed under magnification.The tear was from the distal pierced hole to the brown band on the distal tip.The guidewire was also returned with no problems found.A functional evaluation was performed and the device did not bow due to the torn distal pierced hole, and it was observed that the anchor moved within the catheter.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event of wire break was not confirmed.Upon analysis, the cutting wire was not broken.However, the reported event of unable to bow was confirmed due to the distal pierced hole being torn.This condition could have been caused by submitting the cutting wire to tension during the handle actuation and/or the device being energized during the handle actuation.Also, bowing the device without being completely out of the scope can also lead to a tear in the working length and displacement of the cutting wire.Based on all gathered information, the most probable root cause of this complaint is adverse event related to procedure.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|
|
Event Description
|
Note: this report pertains to the second of two jagtome rx 44 devices used during the same procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a jagtome rx 44 was used in the biliary during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2021.During the procedure, "the jagtome does not bend and tighten optimally." a second jagtome rx 44 was used; however, same thing happened, it did not bend and tighten optimally.Additionally, the cutting wire of the second jagtome rx 44 also broke.It was reported that no part of the cutting wire detached and fell into the patient.The procedure was not completed due to this event as they could not perform sphincterotomy and considering the procedure time.The patient was rescheduled to have another ercp procedure.The exact date of the ercp is unknown.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event and the patient outcome was reported to be fully recovered.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|