The device was not returned to zoll medical corporation for evaluation.Instead, the ecg data from the event was returned to zoll for evaluation.Our review of the data found that the device performed to specification.The first analysis, segments two and three, as well as the second analysis, segments one and two; showed "no matching condition".No matching condition results are due to the measurements of the waveforms not matching predefined measurements for shockable and non shockable rhythms.For segment two, there were some low amplitude peaks which made detection difficult for the algorithm and contributed to some of the other measurements not matching.The algorithm was unable to calculate average width of the ecg as well as being unable to detect an accurate rate.Based on our review of the data we have concluded that the analysis program worked within its limitations and that there was no indication of a malfunction with the device.Based on our review of the data we have concluded that the analysis program worked within its limitations and that there was no indication of a malfunction with the device.Analysis of reports of this type has not identified an increase in trend.
|