C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP MRI 6F CHRONW/OS; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 8806061 |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Difficult to Flush (1251); Failure to Infuse (2340); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
|
Patient Problem
Extravasation (1842)
|
Event Date 09/28/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport implantable port products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport implantable port products is identified.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 11/2021).Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post port device implant, the catheter of the device allegedly protruded.It was further reported that medication flow was interrupted and extravasation of chemotherapy drugs were noted.The device was surgically removed and replaced.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post port device implant, the catheter of the device allegedly protruded.It was further reported that medication flow was interrupted and extravasation of chemotherapy drugs were noted.Reportedly, device was surgically removed and replaced.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport implantable port products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport implantable port products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one powerport isp implantable port was returned for evaluation and one electronic photo was provided for review.The investigation is confirmed for the reported material protrusion issue as the port septum appeared to be partially dislodged from the port body, the photo review also confirms the same.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported flushing and leak issues as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event are unknown and the cannot be evaluated during sample evaluation due to the condition of the returned device.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 11/2021).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport implantable port products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport implantable port products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided for review.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported difficult to flush and fluid leak issue as the exact circumstances at the time of reported event was unknown and cannot be confirmed from the provided photo review.However, the investigation is confirmed for the reported septum dislodgement as the lumen of the septum was protruding the powerport in the provided photo.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 11/2021), g3, h6 (method).H11: d6 (medical device implant date), h6 (device, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post port device implant, the catheter of the device allegedly protruded.It was further reported that medication flow was interrupted and extravasation of chemotherapy drugs were noted.The device was surgically removed and replaced.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|