|
It was reported that the patient experienced edema, stone formation, ureteral reflux, stent dislodgement, migration, stent encrustation, infection, pain and discomfort while using the bard ureteral stent.Medical intervention was unknown.
|
|
It was reported that the patient experienced edema, stone formation, ureteral reflux, stent dislodgement, migration, stent encrustation, infection, pain and discomfort while using the bard ureteral stent.Medical intervention was unknown.
|
|
The reported event was inconclusive.No sample was returned for evaluation.A potential root cause for this event could be, "material selection".The lot number was unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "potential complications associated with retrograde/antegrade positioning of indwelling ureteral stents include the following: edema , stone formation , peritonitis , extravasation , ureteral reflux , stent dislodgement, fragmentation, migration, occlusion , fistula formation , loss of renal function , hemorrhage , pain/discomfort , stent encrustation , hydronephrosis , perforation of kidney, renal pelvis, ureter and/or bladder , ureteral erosion , infection , urinary symptoms" "ureteral stents should be checked periodically for signs of encrustation and proper function.Periodic checks of the stent by cystoscopic and/or radiographic procedures are recommended at intervals deemed to be appropriate by the physician in consideration of the individual patient¿s condition and other patient specific factors.When long-term use is indicated, it is recommended that indwelling time not exceed 365 days.The stent is not intended as a permanent indwelling device." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|