|
Product analysis conclusion; the type ia endoleak and the contained aneurysm rupture that may have led to the fainting event could not be confirmed on the films provided.Lack of pre-implant ct¿s did not allow for a thorough assessment of the pre-implant anatomy.Post-implant ct¿s were not available for review for a more thorough analysis of the stent graft in-vivo configuration.Post-implant angiograms (including endoleak interrogation) could allow for a more comprehensive determination of the endoleak source/cause.It is possible that the noted 5mm proximal aortic neck was a factor in the occurrence of the type ia endoleak.Disease progression with aneurysm morphology changes over the 9 years of implantation of the device may have contributed but this could not be confirmed.B5; additional information received : it was reported that positioning the intensifier (¿eye-eye¿ )so that helifx endoanchors could be placed in the posterior aspect of the aorta was not feasible in this case.The physician was aware of this limitation and thus the plan for treating the type ia endoleak included cuff placement, coils and endoanchors.The physician was satisfied with the result.It was noted that the completion angiogram was done prior to heparin reversal.It was initially reported that the size of the treated ruptured aneurysm was 55mm.The length of the proximal aortic neck was noted to measure 5mm and the diameter of the aorta at renal artery was 24mm.Moderately vessel calcification was reported.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|