• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS W/SA25 A.CONTROL RESERV.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS W/SA25 A.CONTROL RESERV.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX435T
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 03/24/2017
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable, albeit with difficulty.Adjustment test: the progav® 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Result: first, we performed a visual inspection of the progav® 2.0.No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Next, we tested the permeability, adjustability, as well as the brake functionality and brake force.The valve operates as expected and met all specifications.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.Inside the valve we have found a small amount of build-up substances.Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the claim of occlusion.At the time of our investigation, the valve was shown to be permeable, albeit with difficulty.However, it is possible that the deposits observed inside the valve could have caused the malfunction in the past.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of the hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 sys w/sa25 a.Control reserv.(#fx435t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2017.According to the complainant, the valve was believed to be blocked postoperatively.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2017.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 SYS W/SA25 A.CONTROL RESERV.
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
MDR Report Key12724199
Report Number3004721439-2021-00719
Device Sequence Number3983611
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906137335
UDI-Public4041906137335
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K141687
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2017
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,user f
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/13/2021
Device Model NumberFX435T
Device Catalogue NumberFX435T
Device Lot Number20031893
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/30/2017
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/05/2017
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/29/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age36 YR
-
-