|
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2021-02434, 3005168196-2021-02435.
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the superior mesenteric artery (sma) and inferior mesenteric artery (ima) endoleak sac using packing coil lps, ruby coil lps, a lp system detachment handle (handle), and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician advanced a packing coil lp into the target location and attempted to detach it using a handle; however, the packing coil lp failed to detach.The physician then attempted to manually detach the packing coil lp using a hemostat, but the coil still would not detach.Therefore, the packing coil lp was removed.Subsequently, the physician was unable to detach two ruby coil lps in the target location using the same handle.Therefore, the handle was removed.The physician attempted to detach the same ruby coils using a new handle, but the two ruby coil lps would not detach.It was also reported that the physician attempted to manually detach the two ruby coil lps using a hemostat; however, the attempt was unsuccessful.Therefore, the two ruby coil lps and handle were removed.The procedure was completed using new lp coils with a hemostat and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|