|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LEGION PS NP FEM SZ 3 LT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
71423223 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
|
| Date of Event |
06/30/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that patient underwent a tka surgery due to due to "rheumatoid arthritis (double knee disease)".It was performed on (b)(6) 2021, eights days after the tka, the patient developed left knee pain and limited activity after rehabilitation exercise at home.Patient continued to carry out functional exercise, and the pain tended to worsen without relief after rest.The film taken in the local hospital showed a fracture around the legion ps np fem sz 3 lt prosthesis that was treated conservatively with plaster.Patient was admitted to the hospital on (b)(6) 2021 for further treatment.Current health status of patient is in good condition and out of the hospital.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section: h3, h6: the device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that based on the documentation provided, the root cause of the reported events was likely multifactorial as the patient comorbidities and intraop findings including the reported periprosthetic femur fracture, loosened femoral prosthesis, and serious osteoporosis could not be ruled out as potential contributing factors to the reported pain, fracture and revision.The patient impact beyond the reported symptoms, intraop findings, treatment and revision could not be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.If additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, joint tightness and/or patient condition.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that based on the documentation provided, the root cause of the reported events was likely multifactorial as the patient comorbidities and intraop findings including the reported periprosthetic femur fracture, loosened femoral prosthesis, and serious osteoporosis could not be ruled out as potential contributing factors to the reported pain, fracture and revision.The patient impact beyond the reported symptoms, intraop findings, treatment and revision could not be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.The instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, joint tightness, material in use, patient reaction or loss of sterility.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|