|
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SÃ RL CH 5.5 EXP VERSE SCREW 7.0 X 45; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
199721745 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/13/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from depuy spine reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that in the course of the treatment of a scoliosis, problems occurred during the placement of a pedicle screw with a locking screw.After successful implantation of various pedicle screws, the rod was placed.For this purpose, a rod was cut to size, pre-bent accordingly, inserted into the screw heads and temporarily fixed with end caps (partly single, partly dual).Finally, the caps were tightened with torque.It was noticed that on one screw in a segment that was distracted and compressed, the dual innie did not release the required torque.In the correct sequence, the outer part of the closure cap was first tightened with torque.When the inner portion was subsequently attempted to be tightened, no torque could be released.Instead, the inner part spun in the outer part of the dual-innie.Another dual innie was then used, unfortunately with the same result.A subsequent single innie also did not produce the desired result, this one spinning in the screw head before the torque was triggered.It can therefore assumed that the problem is related to the thread of the screw head.Unfortunately, the lot number of this screw was not readable in situ.At this point, all reduction maneuvers had already been carried out and the rod had been fixed in large part, so changing the screw was no longer an option for the user at this point of the operation.Since, according to the user, there was sufficient stability in the construct, it was decided to leave the screw in place and complete the procedure.The surgery was delayed for fifteen (15) minutes due to the reported event.The procedure was successfully completed.This report is for one (1) expedium verse spine system polyaxial screw 5.5 7.0 x 45mm.This is report 1 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device product codes: kwp;kwq;mnh;mni;osh.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H6: investigation summary: the complaint device was not received for investigation.A photo investigation was performed based on the images provided.The images were reviewed, and the complaint condition is not confirmed.The head of the verse screw does not appear to have any damage or defects that would contribute to the complaint condition.As the physical device was not received, it is impossible to tell from the photo provided whether or not the set screw would tighten fully.A definitive assignable root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.No dhr could be performed as no lot number was provided or found in the photos.If a valid lot number is provided or the physical device received, the dhr will be revisited.During the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed (based on the image) that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Comments device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This is report 1 of 4 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|