• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR HIGH-FLEX ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR HIGH-FLEX ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G56236
Medical Device Problem Code Material Separation (1562)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Date of Event 10/26/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It is unknown if the device will be returned.Occupation = cath lab manager.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during a procedure involving a peripheral angiogram on a patient with bilateral iliac stents, the tip separated from a flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath upon removal of the device.The iliac stents had reportedly been in place for years.Access was obtained in the right femoral artery.The anatomy was not tortuous, calcified, or scarred.Resistance was reported upon removal of the sheath, which separated at the tip as it was pulled back over the bifurcation.The dilator was not reinserted prior to removal and was not in place at the time of tip separation.An unspecified wire was in the lumen of the sheath at the time of the event.The separated portion of the device was unable to be snared from the patient; therefore, an open surgical procedure was performed to retrieve the fragment.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Event summary: as reported, during a procedure involving a peripheral angiogram on a patient with bilateral iliac stents, the tip separated from a flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath upon removal of the device.The iliac stents had reportedly been in place for years.Access was obtained in the right femoral artery.The anatomy was not tortuous, calcified, or scarred.Resistance was reported upon removal of the sheath, which separated at the tip as it was pulled back over the bifurcation.The dilator was not reinserted prior to removal and was not in place at the time of tip separation.An unspecified wire was in the lumen of the sheath at the time of the event.The separated portion of the device was unable to be snared from the patient; therefore, an open surgical procedure was performed to retrieve the fragment.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures of the device were conducted during the investigation.No device was returned for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is provided with instructions for use which warn, ¿if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal,¿ and, ¿reinsertion of dilator prior to removal of flexor sheath increases the strength of the sheath and lessens the risk of device separation.If resistance is anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of flexor sheath, consider carefully reinserting the dilator prior to continuing removal.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that unintended user error contributed to this failure mode.The dilator was not reinserted by the user prior to removal of the device.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR HIGH-FLEX ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key12788193
Report Number1820334-2021-02471
Device Sequence Number11959180
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002562363
UDI-Public(01)00827002562363(17)240915(10)14213494
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K142829
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/15/2024
Device Model NumberG56236
Device Catalogue NumberKCFW-6.0-35-55-RB-HFANL1-HC
Device Lot Number14213494
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/26/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/03/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/10/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight93 KG
-
-