• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3000
Medical Device Problem Codes Degraded (1153); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 10/20/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Regurgitation which develops progressively over time can be due to a number of issues including patient related factors or structural valve deterioration.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Regurgitation may also develop progressively if host fibrotic tissue, or pannus, grows onto the bioprosthetic valve.Pannus, a cause of nonstructural dysfunction, may interfere with functionality of the device by restricting the leaflet motion leading to abnormal coaptation.Alternatively, nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.The subject device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient with a 21mm 3000 pericardial valve, implanted in the aortic position, underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 13 years, 26 days month due to insufficiency and leaflet malfunction.The tavr was performed with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.No additional information has been provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: added information to.The cause of the event was due to patient factors and progression of underlying valvular disease.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient with a 21mm 3000 pericardial valve, implanted in the aortic position, underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 13 years, 26 days due to insufficiency, leaflet malfunction, and degeneration.Patient presented with congestive heart failure (nyha class 3-4) the tavr was performed with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.Patient was transferred to recovery.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: the device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Regurgitation which develops progressively over time can be due to a number of issues including patient related factors or structural valve deterioration.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprostheses explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Regurgitation may also develop progressively if host fibrotic tissue, or pannus, grows onto the bioprosthetic valve.Pannus, a cause of nonstructural dysfunction, may interfere with functionality of the device by restricting the leaflet motion leading to abnormal coaptation.The cause of the event was most likely due to patient factors and progression of underlying valvular disease.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
reginald santos
1 edwards way
mailstop ant 6.1
irvine, CA 92614
9492502731
MDR Report Key12808263
Report Number2015691-2021-06298
Device Sequence Number17529803
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103162240
UDI-Public00690103162240
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057/S18
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2008
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/31/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2012
Device Model Number3000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/20/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/07/2022
01/06/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/13/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/11/2022
01/31/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/06/2008
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-