• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA INC ATRASUMP; SUCKER, CARDIOTOMY RETURN, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA INC ATRASUMP; SUCKER, CARDIOTOMY RETURN, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number SU-XXXXX
Medical Device Problem Code Disconnection (1171)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/21/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Livanova usa received a report of atrasump tip disconnection during a procedure.There is not report of any patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was not provided.Pma/510k: exempt.At the submission of the case, the customer has provided picture of the disconnected atrasump.The units were requested for deep investigation.Initial visual inspection of the provided picture suggested the transition bond was not performed for this unit.First piece inspection and qc sampling have did not identify any other similar issue.Retraining for employees involved with the build and inspection of the transition bond step has been performed.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is obtained, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Not yet received.
 
Event or Problem Description
Livanova usa received a report of atrasump tip disconnection during a procedure.There is not report of any patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was not provided.Pma/510k: exempt.At the submission of the case, the customer has provided picture of the disconnected atrasump.The units were requested for deep investigation.Initial visual inspection of the provided picture suggested the transition bond was not performed for this unit.First piece inspection and qc sampling have did not identify any other similar issue.Retraining for employees involved with the build and inspection of the transition bond step has been performed.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is obtained, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Not yet received.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
According to follow up information with the customer, other 2 cannula units belonging to the same lot were manually tested by not forcefully pulling the tip and the customer reported the tip came off as if it was not ¿welded¿ to the rest of the cannula.The seven (7) unused remaining units have been received at sorin italia.
 
Event or Problem Description
See initial report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The complained cannula has been received at livanova usa inc facilities and is under investigation.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is obtained, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
See initial report.
 
Event or Problem Description
See initial report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Livanova received a report stating that, during the procedure, the tip of the su-29602 suction sump cannula came off.No patient was affected.The dhr review highlighted that the complained lot was released conforming to specifications.The unit has been requested for investigation and received in arvada site along with other 8 not-used units.Inspection of the disconnected part (site between the connector and the tubing) and of all the other returned units suggested that the seal has been done with a thin layer of adhesive.Dimensional analysis of the critical dimensions for this connection were found to be in specification.Review of the livanova complaint database identified in total 4 similar events related to this type of cannula.Based on livanova investigation, it cannot be ruled out that the root cause of the tip detachment is related to a manufacturing deviation during the assembly phase.To prevent reoccurrence, a capa project was launched.Livanova will keep monitoring the market.
 
Event or Problem Description
See initial report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
In the frame of the capa project, additional investigation of the bond between the connector and tubing has indicated a strength limit related to the adhesive bond between these components due to the design of the connector.To increase the tip to tube pull strength, design changes of the connector are under investigation.The risk remains in the acceptable region.Livanova will keep monitoring the market.Investigation conclusion has been updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ATRASUMP
Common Device Name
SUCKER, CARDIOTOMY RETURN, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA INC
14401 w 65th way
arvada CO 80004
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA INC
14401 w 65th way
arvada CO 80004
Manufacturer Contact
enrico greco
14401 w 65th way
arvada, CO 80004
MDR Report Key12809044
Report Number1718850-2021-00050
Device Sequence Number5120286
Product Code DTS
UDI-Device Identifier00803622105913
UDI-Public(01)00803622105913(240)SU-29602(17)240831(10)2123500110
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2024
Device Model NumberSU-XXXXX
Device Catalogue NumberSU-29602
Device Lot Number2123500110
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/02/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/21/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/18/2021
02/04/2022
05/19/2022
02/24/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/15/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/15/2021
02/24/2022
06/16/2022
03/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-