|
As reported, the balloon of an aviator plus.014 5.0x20 142cm ruptured during the procedure.There was leakage noted from the balloon during inflation.The procedure was completed using another unknown device.There was no reported patient injury.The device was used for an interventional peripheral procedure.The unknown target vessel had mild calcification and mild tortuosity.There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, or removing the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.The device was stored and prepped as per the instructions for use (ifu).There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product the product into the patient.The device prepped normally.An unknown indeflator was used and the same indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel.Other procedural details were requested but are unknown, unavailable, or not applicable.The device will be returned for evaluation.
|
|
Complaint conclusion: as reported, the balloon of an aviator plus.014 5.0 x 20 142cm ruptured during the procedure.There was leakage noted from the balloon during inflation.The procedure was completed using another unknown device.There was no reported patient injury.The device was used for an interventional peripheral procedure.The unknown target vessel had mild calcification and mild tortuosity.There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, the stylet, or any of the sterile packaging components.The device was stored and prepped as per the instructions for use (ifu).There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device prepped normally.An unknown indeflator was used and the same indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel.Other procedural details were requested but are unknown, unavailable, or not applicable.One product was returned for analysis.A non-sterile aviator plus.014 5.0 x 20 142cm was received for analysis coiled inside a plastic bag.Per visual analysis, the balloon appears to have been previously inflated.No other anomalies were observed at the naked eye.Per functional analysis, balloon inflation testing was performed.A syringe filled with water was attached to the inflation lumen of the unit and pressure applied.A leakage was observed coming from the proximal area of the balloon.Per sem analysis, results showed that the balloon leakage was caused by a rupture on the balloon surface.The inner surface presented no anomalies near the balloon rupture.The outer surface presented evidence of scratch marks near the balloon rupture.This type of damage is commonly caused during the interaction of the balloon material with a sharp object or mechanical damage.It is very likely that the same factors that caused the observed scratch marks on the balloon outer surface could have led to the ruptured condition found on the received device.It seems the balloon material near the rupture was torn either due to the interaction of the balloon with calcified spicules located on the lesion or with a sharp object from the outside of the balloon.No other anomalies were observed during the sem analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 82195722 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿balloon burst¿ was confirmed via device analysis.However, the exact cause cannot be determined.A rupture was observed on the proximal area of the balloon during inflation testing.The outer surface of the balloon presented evidence of scratch marks adjacent to the rupture.It is likely vessel characteristics of calcification contributed to the reported event as evidenced by device analysis.The balloon material near the rupture appears to have been torn either due to the interaction of the balloon with calcified spicules located on the lesion or with a sharp object from the outside of the balloon.According to the instructions for use, although this is not intended as a mitigation, ¿prior to use, the device should be examined to verify functionality and integrity, and ensure that its size is suitable for the specific procedure.Do not exceed the rated burst pressure recommended on the label.The rated burst pressure is based on the results of in-vitro testing.At least 99.9% of the balloons (with a 95% confidence) will not burst at or below their rated burst pressure.Use of a pressure-monitoring device is recommended to prevent over-pressurization.Use only the recommended balloon inflation medium (a 50/50 mixture by volume of contrast medium and normal saline).Never use air or any gaseous medium to inflate the balloon.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event.Therefore, no corrective or preventive action will be taken at this time.
|