| Model Number |
SCPX127LH |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Rupture (1546); Connection Problem (2900)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/29/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: na.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a doctor noticed that the 350 cpx4 plus smooth low height was leaking air from a slit.It never went into the patient and was noticed on the back table when he was preparing it.There were no patient consequences or procedure delays reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 10-dec-2021, mentor became aware of an incorrect code used in the initial report.The most appropriate medical device problem code is material rupture (a0412), and h6 has been updated accordingly.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(6).H6 medical device problem code has been updated to material rupture (a0412) to more accurately capture the reported event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 16-dec-2021, the device evaluation was completed.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that a tear was found on the posterior aspect of the tissue expander, measuring approximately 0.6 cm.Leak testing was performed, according to the mentor procedure, and no additional leak sites were detected during the analysis.Microscopic examination was performed on the edges of the rupture, and parallel striations were found in the whole area of the tear.Parallel striations are consistent with markings made by a sharp object perforating the tissue expander shell.Based on the information currently available, microscopic examination of the returned product indicates that the tissue expander could have been damaged during implantation.The product insert data sheet cautions to not allow cautery devices or sharp instruments, such as scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, adson forceps, or scissors to contact the device during the implantation or other surgical procedures.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2021, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun, but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|