|
Model Number 7205306 |
Device Problem
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/27/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy procedure, the shaver blade released a kind of dirt in the patients joint.The procedure was successfully completed without delay using a back-up device.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.An analysis of the customer provided image showed image of full radius blade and image of dark substance and blade.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.It is unknown if all of the debris was removed from the patients joint.The material of the device is 304 stainless steel.The full radius blade is an externally communicating device, it is neither manufactured nor intended for implantation.It is also not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond the reported possible retained debris could not be definitively determined.If retained micro-motion or movement cannot be predicted.There is potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.No further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.There was no way to determine if the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was confirmed but root cause couldn't be determined, factors that could have contributed to the reported event include inadequate irrigation during use, or an impact event inconsistent with normal use.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A visual inspection showed that the device was not returned in it's original packaging.A visual inspection did not find markings on the distal tip of the inner blade or any evidence of metal shedding on the inside of the outer blade.No dirt like debris could be seen.A functional evaluation of the device in saline water did not produce any foreign material into the solution.The blade functioned as intended.An analysis of the customer provided image showed image of full radius blade and image of dark substance and blade.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.It is unknown if all of the debris was removed from the patients joint.The material of the device is 304 stainless steel.The full radius blade is an externally communicating device, it is neither manufactured nor intended for implantation.It is also not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond the reported possible retained debris could not be definitively determined.If retained micro-motion or movement cannot be predicted.There is potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.No further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.The complaint was confirmed but root cause couldn't be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include inadequate irrigation during use, or an impact event inconsistent with normal use.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|