• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARTHROCARE CORP. SPEEDLOCK; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARTHROCARE CORP. SPEEDLOCK; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number OM-7500
Device Problems Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Firing Problem (4011)
Patient Problems Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/28/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case- (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a shoulder arthroscopy procedure, there was a failure of the speedlock implant.The sutures were not pulled into the shaft of the inserter into the implant.There was excessive suture into the joint and there was no salvage.The procedure was successfully completed with non-significant delay using a s+n back-up device.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H10 h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation of the device showed it was not received in any original packaging.The wire snare ring and the anchor were not returned.The long snare wire has been coiled up on the suture reel.The distal end of the insertion device is bent.A functional test of device one is not possible since the device is intended for single use.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states based on the information provided, the implantable sutures was retained in the patient¿s joint it was left secure.Furthermore, micro-motion and/or migration of the retained sutures is unlikely.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include issues encountered while loading the suture into the device or introduction into the cavity.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10¨ h3, h6¨the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation of the device showed it was not received in any original packaging.The wire snare ring and the anchor were not returned.The long snare wire has been coiled up on the suture reel.The distal end of the insertion device is bent.A functional test of device one is not possible since the device is intended for single use.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states based on the information provided, a user error was the likely cause of the reported adverse event.Since the implantable sutures was retained in the patient¿s joint it was left secure.Furthermore, micro-motion and/or migration of the retained sutures is unlikely.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force, do not bend or twist the inserter handle during and after insertion as damage to the implant or incomplete insertion may result; the system requires tension to be distributed through the suture ends to achieve suture lock.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference case (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation of the device showed it was not received in any original packaging.The wire snare ring and the anchor were not returned.The long snare wire has been coiled up on the suture reel.The distal end of the insertion device is bent.A functional test of device one is not possible since the device is intended for single use.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states based on the information provided, the implantable sutures was retained in the patient¿s joint it was left secure.Furthermore, micro-motion and/or migration of the retained sutures is unlikely.The root cause has been associated with the use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include issues encountered while loading the suture into the device or introduction into the cavity.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPEEDLOCK
Type of Device
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARTHROCARE CORP.
7000 w. william cannon
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARTHROCARE CORP.
7000 w. william cannon
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key12821361
MDR Text Key280829796
Report Number3006524618-2021-01022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
UDI-Device Identifier00885556724675
UDI-Public885556724675
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130196
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/01/2023
Device Catalogue NumberOM-7500
Device Lot Number2062207
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/15/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/28/2021
Initial Date FDA Received11/16/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/26/2024
03/12/2024
06/11/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/27/2024
03/14/2024
06/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-