The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Based on the information reviewed, a cause for the reported perforation cannot be determined.The reported patient effect of perforation is listed in the mitraclip instructions for use (ifu) as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported unexpected medical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstance.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
This is being filed to report the asd shunt requiring intervention.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.Two clips were implanted, reducing mr to 2.After withdrawing the steerable guide catheter (sgc), the atrial septal defect with left to right shunt was treated with a closure device.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|