|
"device delivery system came detached from the hub.User couldn't deploy the stent.User used another of the same gpn to complete the procedure.What was the target location for the stent? sfa.Patient outcome: did any unintended section of the device remain inside the patient¿s body? no if yes, please describe.Was the patient hospitalized or was there prolonged hospitalization due to this occurrence? no.If yes, please describe.Did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no.If yes, please describe.Did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedures? no if yes, please specify additional procedures and provide details.5has the complainant reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no.Has the complainant reported that the product caused or contributed to the adverse effects? no.Additional questions: ziv5/ziv6/zfv6 are images of the device or procedure available? n/a, yes, no.No.At what stage of the procedure did the complaint occur? unpacking or preparation of the device, insertion, stent placement, removing the introducer.When trying to deploy details of access sheath used (name, fr size, length)? 5fr cordis rain sheath, access in anterior tibial.What was the target location for the stent? sfa.Was the product inspected for kinks or damage before use? n/a, yes, no.Yes.Was the device used percutaneously? n/a, yes, no.Yes.Was the device flushed through both flushing port before the procedure, as per ifu? n/a, yes, no.Yes.Was pre-dilation performed ahead of placement of the stent? n/a, yes, no.Yes.Was post-dilation performed after the placement of the stent? n/a, yes, no.N/a.Details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hyrdophyllic)? hydro st 300cm.Did the patient exhibit difficult or altered anatomy (if altered please specify how it is altered)? n/a, tortuous, calcified, altered highligy calcified.Was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide to the target location? n/a, yes, no.Yes, it was a tough case.Was resistance encountered when advancing the delivery system to the target location? n/a, yes, no.No.How did the physician deal with this resistance? kept jamming it in.Was the approach ipsilateral or contralateral? n/a, ipsilateral, contralateral ipsilateral if contralateral, was the bifurcation angle steep? n/a, yes, no.Did the tip of the delivery system cross the target location? n/a, yes, no.Yes.Was the delivery system tracked around a tight angle in the patient anatomy? n/a, yes, no.No.Was the delivery system damaged/kinked/twisted during deployment? n/a, yes, no.No.Was the handle pulled towards the hub during deployment? n/a, yes, no.Yes.Was the delivery system pushed during deployment? n/a, yes, no.No.Was the stent deployed smoothly / without resistance? n/a, yes, no.No.If no, please detail any difficulty experienced during deployment.What artery was the stent placed in? n/a.Was the stent fully deployed from the delivery system prior to removal of the delivery system? n/a, yes, no.No.Did the patient have any pre-existing conditions? n/a, yes, no.No.If yes, please specify.Did the patient require any additional procedures as a result of this event? n/a, yes, no.No.What intervention (if any) was required? none.Was the secondary intervention performed during the same procedure as the device failure or was it scheduled for another day? n/a, same procedure, another day n/a.Were any other defects (other than the complaint issue) observed on the delivery system prior to return (e.G.Kink)? n/a, yes, no.No.Please specify if yes.
|