• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH V40 COCR LFIT HEAD 40MM/+8; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH V40 COCR LFIT HEAD 40MM/+8; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 6260-9-340
Medical Device Problem Codes Corroded (1131); Degraded (1153); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Osteolysis (2377); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Date of Event 12/03/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with an lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his right hip on or about (b)(6) 2007 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the devices at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event an event regarding disassociation, corrosion, osteolysis and abnormal ion level involving a metal head was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports the failure of a right total hip arthroplasty approximately 13 years after implantation due to femoral loosening, osteolysis, and head disassociation.I can confirm this event took place since i was able to read the revision operation report.Regarding the possible root cause of this event, i cannot determine it with certainty.Causes of femoral loosening or multifactorial including surgical technique factors, patient activity factors and patient¿s height and weight.Causes of osteolysis are multifactorial including poly wear and other types of particle synovitis.Causes of head disassociation are multifactorial including trunnion failure, and corrosion.In this case i cannot confirm corrosion since there is no metallurgical analysis.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate the devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: lot specific voluntary recall was initiated for the lfit v40 cocr heads within scope of a capa.The investigation revealed that only specific catalog numbers and specific lots are impacted by the regulatory action and that the affected lots were manufactured on or before march 4, 2011.The root cause analysis identified a process related anomaly as to the affected sizes and lots.The affected product has all been implanted and/or expired.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with an lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his right hip on or about (b)(6) 2007 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the devices at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.*update on (b)(6) 2022 per clinician review: "[.] an operative note by dr.Dated (b)(6) 2020 is provided.The preoperative diagnosis was ¿mechanical loosening of prosthetic hip¿ and the postop diagnosis was the same.The operation performed was a revision right total hip arthroplasty.The surgeon used a cementless 70 mm shell, a polyethylene with a 28 mm inner diameter, a wagner sl femoral stem was utilized, demineralized bone putty, and a 28 mm femoral head was utilized.Femoral component was grossly loose.There was no evidence of infection.The surgeon describes a huge amount of osteolysis with "amorphous sludge type of whitish gray material".He states that the femoral head was disassociated from the femoral stem and there was a large amount of corrosive black typical material on both the male trunnion as well as the female portion of the femoral head.[.] " per operative report: "[.] the explant osteotome was used to remove the well-fixed acetabular component.There were no significant defects behind the acetabular shell.[.] ".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
V40 COCR LFIT HEAD 40MM/+8
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key12860269
Report Number0002249697-2021-01948
Device Sequence Number4163969
Product Code LPH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327032765
UDI-Public07613327032765
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K061434
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2007
Device Explanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/29/2022
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2012
Device Model Number6260-9-340
Device Catalogue Number6260-9-340
Device Lot Number8PEMKD
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/28/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/03/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/23/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/22/2007
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
2249697-08/29/2016-007R
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-