H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of difficult placement/device damage was confirmed; however, the root cause was not identified.The product returned for evaluation was three photographs depicting a 22ga x 8cm powerglide pro midline catheter assembly.The catheter had been advanced and the safety mechanism was engaged over the needle tip.The first two photographs depicted the housing and needle shaft.The needle shaft appeared to be bent.The guidewire advancer was advanced; however, the guidewire was not visible past the safety mechanism.The third photograph depicted the advanced catheter.Blood residue was evident within the catheter shaft.Multiple bends and kinks were observed along the catheter shaft.The advanced state of the guidewire and the inability to observe the guidewire past the safety suggested that the guidewire as broken, as indicated in the event description.The bent needle and deformed catheter were consistent with attempted insertion against resistance, and guidewire damage can occur if the wire is retracted against the needle following such insertion resistance; however, an additional factor(s) may have contributed, but could not be identified through inspection of the submitted photographs.Consequently this complaint is confirmed as ¿cause unknown¿ at this time.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|