Catalog Number 515111 |
Device Problem
Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/26/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that when attaching a bd phaseal¿ protector p50j to vial the connection was incomplete.The following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from (b)(6) to english: when attaching the protector to a vial, the hcp noticed that adhesive glueing of the expansion chamber film was poor/incomplete.An anticancer agent was adhering to the actual sample returned for investigation (no information on the drug name was provided).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medical device expiration date: unknown.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.Device manufacture date: unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medical device expiration date: unknown.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.Device manufacture date: unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that when attaching a bd phaseal¿ protector p50j to vial the connection was incomplete.The following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from (b)(6) to english: when attaching the protector to a vial, the hcp noticed that adhesive glueing of the expansion chamber film was poor/incomplete.An anticancer agent was adhering to the actual sample returned for investigation (no information on the drug name was provided).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following fields were updated due to additional information: d10: device available for eval? yes.D10: returned to manufacturer on: 2021-12-29.H6: investigation summary sample received for investigation.The product was visually inspected, observing that the oval of the bladder was cracked/broken, leaving open the seal of the film that makes the bell of the protector watertight.The lot number is unknown, so the device history record review (dhr) and quality notification (qn) review could not be performed.The breakage could be due to several unusual occurrences such as a jam in the shield assembly machine, or a jam in the packaging line.It could also be the case of a blow or damage in the process of transport or in the same clinic of use.However, without the batch number, it is not possible to investigate if any of these jams have occurred during the production of the batch, so it is not possible to find a root cause in our manufacturing process.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that when attaching a bd phaseal¿ protector p50j to vial the connection was incomplete.The following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from japanese to english: when attaching the protector to a vial, the hcp noticed that adhesive glueing of the expansion chamber film was poor/incomplete.An anticancer agent was adhering to the actual sample returned for investigation (no information on the drug name was provided).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|