| Model Number |
G50620 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Off-Label Use (1494)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/28/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This case was a revision case for a patient who already had a metal stent in the left intrahepatic bile duct.The doctor wanted to insert zilbs-635-8-6 into the right intrahepatic bile duct, and first inflated the stenosis using a dilation balloon and sbdc-6,7.Then, the nurse inserted the wire guide lumen port and stent lumen port.After flushing, insert the zilver along the 0.025" (user error), straight, visi2 wire guide.However, zilver continued to fail through the right intrahepatic bile duct.So when they removed the zilver from the scope, the front of the stent came out.The red safety lock was not removed.So they inserted an 8mm metal stent of m.I.Tech with 5.9fr introducer instead and finished the procedure.1.2.7 was the introducer advanced through the side of a previously placed stent? it was tried to do (off label uses - stent in stent deployment) did any section of the device remain inside the patient body? no; did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no; did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedure(s)? no; were there any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no; did the product cause or contribute to the adverse effect(s)? no.For all complaints, ask: what is the reorder number of the wire guide used with this device? visi2 0.025" straight.If not, with the device in question, how was the procedure finished? m.I.Tech hanaro stent _ benefit¿ stent was inserted.(5.9fr introducer ).For complaints occurring during use (once in contact with endoscope), also ask: had a sphincterotomy been performed prior to this occurrence? no.Had dilation of the obstructed area been performed prior to this occurrence? yes, dilation balloon and soehendra dilation catheters were used.What is the endoscope manufacturer and model number that was used? tjf-260v (olympus).Please describe the location in the body where the stent was to be placed.Ihd right.Was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide through the obstructed area? yes.Was resistance encountered when advancing the stent and introducer through the obstructed area? yes.Was the introducer advanced through the side of a previously placed stent? it was tried to do.Please estimate amount of time the stent was in place prior to this occurrence.Unknown.Did any section of the device detach inside the endoscope or patient? no.For fs-zilbs only, also ask: was the wire guide removed before beginning stent deployment? for zilbs only, also ask: after stent deployment, was the wire guide removed before withdrawing the tip of the introducer from the deployed stent? stent deployment was imposible.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k163018 the investigation is in progress and a follow up mdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) # - k163018.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the device evaluated on 10-dec-21: "sheath kinked.Stent partially deployed with red safety lock in place.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: this complaint is related to (b)(4) (3001845648-2021-00886).The zilbs-635-8-6 device of lot number c1791786 involved in this complaint was returned for evaluation, without the original packaging.With the information provided, a physical examination and document-based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation the device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on the (b)(6) 2021.On evaluation of the device kinks were observed approx.1.5cm, 42cm, 45cm and 63.5cm from distal end of handle on the outer sheath.Approx 0.5cm of the stent was partially deployed.The red safety lock was in place.The device flushed as expected.The 0.035 size wire guide would not pass the kinks on the outer sheath.Document review prior to distribution zilbs-635-8-6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records for zilbs-635-8-6 of lot number c1791786 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.There is evidence to suggest the user did not follow the instructions for use ifu0065-3 the instructions for use ifu0065-3 states the following: this device is not intended to be deployed through the wall of a previously placed or existing metal stent.Doing so could make it difficult or impossible to remove the delivery system.The information provided indicates they tried stent in stent deployment.Root cause review a definitive root cause of off-label use has been identified from the investigation.From the information provided it is known that the stent was deployed using a stent-in-stent technique which is considered as off-label use.It is also known that a 0.025¿ wire guide was used with the device.Summary the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Annex g code updated from g04122 to g07001.Pma/510(k) #k163018.Device evaluation: this complaint is related to (b)(4) (3001845648-2021-00886).The zilbs-635-8-6 device of lot number c1791786 involved in this complaint was returned for evaluation, without the original packaging.With the information provided, a physical examination and document-based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation: the device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on the 10 december 2021.On evaluation of the device kinks were observed approx.1.5cm, 42cm, 45cm and 63.5cm from distal end of handle on the outer sheath.Approx 0.5cm of the stent was partially deployed.The red safety lock was in place.The device flushed as expected.The 0.035 size wire guide would not pass the kinks on the outer sheath.Document review: prior to distribution zilbs-635-8-6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records for zilbs-635-8-6 of lot number c1791786 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.There is evidence to suggest the user did not follow the instructions for use ifu0065-3 the instructions for use ifu0065-3 states the following: this device is not intended to be deployed through the wall of a previously placed or existing metal stent.Doing so could make it difficult or impossible to remove the delivery system.The information provided indicates they tried stent in stent deployment.Root cause review: a definitive root cause of off-label use has been identified from the investigation.From the information provided it is known that the stent was deployed using a stent-in-stent technique which is considered as off-label use.It is also known that a 0.025¿ wire guide was used with the device.Summary: the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Quality completed updating file on 05-jan-2022.Supplemental follow-up report required due to the update of the g code (component code desc) from g04122 - stent to g07001 - part/component/sub-assembly term not applicable.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|