• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Code Inaccurate Delivery (2339)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/12/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted therefore it was not explanted.The device is not received; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device/lot history record and complaint trending for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that lens was advanced too far into the cartridge during insertion.There was a patient contact.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes, returned to manufacturer on 12/20/2021.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed trace amounts of viscoelastic residue inside of the cartridge.Further inspection of the cartridge revealed a lens stuck in the cartridge and that the lens was partially overridden by the plunger rod.The handpiece was disassembled and the assembly was inspected, presenting with no issues.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search revealed that no additional complaint was received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key12887346
Report Number3012236936-2021-00112
Device Sequence Number4917900
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746435
UDI-Public(01)05050474746435(17)240604
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMT
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/04/2024
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U145
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/20/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/02/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/14/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/29/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/04/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-