• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM LIGHTNING 12; QEW

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM LIGHTNING 12; QEW Back to Search Results
Model Number LITNG12XTORQ100-A
Medical Device Problem Code Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/05/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure to treat a arteriovenous (av) graft using an indigo system aspiration catheter 12 (cat12).During the procedure, the physician completed approximately three passes using the cat12.While advancing the cat12 during the fourth pass, the physician noticed that the coating at the distal end of the cat12 had started to peel off.Therefore, the cat12 was removed.The procedure was completed using a new cat12.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned cat12 confirmed that the distal tip was damaged.If the catheter is forcefully manipulated, damage at distal tip may occur.The distal catheter damage was likely the reported peeled coating.No coating was confirmed to be peeling from the returned device.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the follow-up #01 mfr report: and is being corrected on this follow-up #02 mfr report: evaluation of the returned cat12 confirmed that the distal tip was damaged.If the catheter is forcefully advanced against resistance, the distal tip may become damaged.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM LIGHTNING 12
Common Device Name
QEW
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key12900594
Report Number3005168196-2021-02712
Device Sequence Number14459152
Product Code QEW
UDI-Device Identifier00815948022560
UDI-Public00815948022560
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNE
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K210323
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/09/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/26/2024
Device Model NumberLITNG12XTORQ100-A
Device Catalogue NumberLITNG12XTORQ100
Device Lot NumberH11356
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/05/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/23/2021
01/14/2005
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/30/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/04/2022
04/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/27/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-