• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM FRAMING COIL; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM FRAMING COIL; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number FC-5-10-3D
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/02/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received report that an axium framing coil detached prematurely.It was noted that the device was prepared as indicated in the instructions for use.The pushwire was not bent or broken.There was no friction or other difficulty during delivery.The physician did reposition the coil 3 times but did not rotate the pushwire or attempt to detach the coil.Continuous catheter flush was administered during the procedure.The coil was removed from the patient and replaced to complete the procedure.There was no harm or injury to the patient who was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a ruptured saccular posterior communicating artery aneurysm.The aneurysm max diameter was 6.34mm and the neck diameter was 3.65mm.Blood flow and vessel tortuosity were normal.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received reported that there were no detachment attempts (instant detacher or manual method) made.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: ¿ as found condition: the pushwire was returned for evaluation within the inner pouch; inside of a biohazard bag and a shipping box.There was no implant coil returned with the pushwire.¿ visual inspection/damage location details: the implant coil appeared to be detached from the pushwire.The shield coil found intact but stretched.The coin was not present against the lumen stop as it was pulling back.The pusher was found broken at the distal break indicator (manual detachment location); retained by the release wire; it appeared that the manual detachment was attempted at this location.The ai and coupler tubing was found present and intact; indicative of mechanical detachment was not attempted at this location.Bends were found at 11.0cm to 30.5cm from the proximal end.¿ testing/analysis: under the microscope, the outer jacket was then removed to gain access the coin.The coin was measured in 3 locations (0.072mm @ 0.063mm; measured 0.085mm @ 0.127mm; measured 0.094mm @ 0.275mm) and found to be within specifications.The inner diameter of the lumen stop, and the inner diameter of the retainer ring were found to be visually acceptable.The lumen stop inner diameter (id) was measured to be 0.00269¿ and found to be within specification.The retainer ring inner diameter (id) was measured to be 0.00464 ¿and found to be within specification.All other subassemblies appeared to be normal, and no other anomalies were observed.¿ conclusion: based on the analysis performed, the axium prime coil was not confirmed to have "non-detachment" issue as the pushwire was returned with the implant coil already detached.However, the root cause could not be determined.Based on the returned device, there was evidence of manual detachment attempt to detach the coil.The coin was pulled back from the lumen stop.The pulling back of the coin from the lumen stop may have contributed to the detachment of the implant coil from the pushwire.The pushwire was bent at several locations.However, the cause for damage could not be determined.There was no non-conformance to specification identified that led to the reported issue.The review of lot history records shows that the finished device has met all manufacturing requirements and specifications during final assembly and quality inspection.Since the implant coil was not returned; any contribution of the implant coil to the non-detachment issue could not be determined.Per the axium prime coil instructions for use (ifu): if the coil does not detach after 3 attempts, discard the i.D.(instant detacher) and replace with a new i.D.(instant detacher).Also, in the rare event that the coil does not detach and cannot be removed from the implant delivery pusher, use the following steps for detachment.A.Grip the hypotube approximately 5 cm distal of the positive load indicator at the hypotube break indicator and bend the implant delivery pusher just distal to the hbi 180 degrees.B.Next straighten the pusher back, continue bending and straightening until the pusher tubing opens exposing the release element.C.Gently separate the proximal and distal ends of the open pusher.Then, under fluoroscopy, pull the proximal portion of the implant delivery pusher approximately 2-3 cm to confirm implant detachment per ifu.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM FRAMING COIL
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key12908420
Report Number2029214-2021-01543
Device Sequence Number14454179
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536034174
UDI-Public00847536034174
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K162704
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/12/2023
Device Model NumberFC-5-10-3D
Device Catalogue NumberFC-5-10-3D
Device Lot NumberB116917
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/04/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/26/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/03/2021
01/17/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/01/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/21/2021
02/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/12/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-