|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR CPX 4 BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER WITH SUTURE TABS; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
3549215 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Off-Label Use (1494); Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
10/25/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) caucasian female patient underwent a primary breast reconstruction with a 650cc mentor cpx 4 breast tissue expander with suture tabs and experienced a deflation on the left side post-operatively, which was confirmed via a physical exam.As a result, the patient underwent explantation on (b)(6) 2021.The tissue expander was in use for longer than six months, which is considered off label use of the product.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2021, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2022, mentor completed evaluation of the device.Device evaluation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that no damage or anomalies were observed on the med height te w/sut tabs 650cc tissue expander.Leak testing was performed, in accordance with mentor procedures, and a tear was noted on the union between the shell and anterior patch.A microscopic examination was performed and the cause of the deflation could not be identified.Although no conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: causes of deflation of tissue expander include but are not limited to the following events: crease fold failure, intraoperative or postoperative trauma, excessive stresses or manipulations as may occur during normal, daily routines including customary and purposeful trauma such as that which can occur during vigorous exercise, athletics, etc.Based on the implantation and explantation dates provided, it was noticed that the device was inside the patient for more than six (6) months.Per mentor instructions for use (ifu), tissue expanders are not intended for implantation beyond 6 months.Therefore, this device was used in an off-label manner.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|