|
Manufacturing and quality control data: the progav® shunt system was manufactured by a qualified employee in december 2011.Deviations during assembly did not occur.The system was sterilized by miethke and released for shipment after final inspection.For the purposes of this investigation, the progav® shunt system is comprised of a progav® adjustable pressure valve with a normal pressure range of 0 to 20 cmh2o and a shuntassistant® fixed pressure valve with a fixed pressure range of 20 cmh2o.The shunt system was inspected as article (b)(4).All parameters have been inspected and approved during the manufacturing process.All parameters have been assessed as meeting specifications.Visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valves were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that both valves are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of overdrainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the progav® is operating within the accepted tolerance in the horizontal position.The shuntassistant® is operating within the accepted tolerances in the vertical position too.Adjustment test: the progav® was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, some deposits were found in both valves results: based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the clinical claim of non-adjustability.At the time of our investigation, the valves were able to be adjusted to all specified settings.However, it is possible that the deposits observed inside the valve could have caused the malfunction in the past.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.Significant outside pressure, for example by too much force from the adjustment tool or by a fall or impact to the head of the patient, can compromise the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|
|
It was reported that a progav shuntsystem (part # fv434t) was implanted during a procedure performed in january 2012.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in overdrainage and was difficult to adjust.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2021.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: (b)(6), height: 150 centimeters (cm), weight: (b)(6) kilograms (kg), gender: male.
|