| Model Number |
FM921T |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that there was an issue with fm921t - cranioplate 1.5 scr.Mag.Cross l:4mm.According to the complaint description, the device broke and has burrs.This malfunction prolonged the surgery.Additional information was not provided nor available.The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation results: visual investigation: eleven screws (hereinafter called screw "a" - "k") with broken off tip and deformation arrived for investigation.The broken off tips were not enclosed.We made a microscopic investigation of all eleven screws.The rest of the thread of screw a is partially damaged.The fracture surface of screw a shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw a shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw b shows little damages.The fracture surface of screw b shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw b shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw c is in a good condition.The fracture surface of screw c shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw c shows significant wear and deformation.The rest of the thread of screw d is in a good condition.The fracture surface of screw d shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw d shows only minor wear.The rest of the thread of screw e is soiled and damaged.The fracture surface of screw e shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw e shows only minor deformation.The rest of the thread of screw f is damaged and deformed.The tip of screw f is not broken only deformed.The phillips head of screw f shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw g is damaged and deformed.The fracture surface of screw g shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw g shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw h is in a good condition.The tip exhibit no damages or deformations.The phillips head of screw h shows significant wear and deformation.The rest of the thread of screw i is soiled but in a good condition.The tip exhibit no damages or deformations.The phillips head of screw i shows significant wear.The rest of the thread of screw j is in a good condition.The fracture surface of screw j shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw j shows significant wear and deformation.The rest of the thread of screw k shows minor deformation.The tip of screw k is not broken only deformed.The phillips head of screw k shows minor wear.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for the available lot number and were found to be according to our specifications valid at the time of production.Review of the complaint history revealed that 5 similar complaints have been filed against products from this batch number.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level ((b)(4)) according to din en iso (b)(4) is still acceptable.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|