• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG CRANIOPLATE 1.5 SCR.MAG.CROSS L:4MM; CRANIAL FIXATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG CRANIOPLATE 1.5 SCR.MAG.CROSS L:4MM; CRANIAL FIXATION Back to Search Results
Model Number FM921T
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there was an issue with fm921t - cranioplate 1.5 scr.Mag.Cross l:4mm.According to the complaint description, the device broke and has burrs.This malfunction prolonged the surgery.Additional information was not provided nor available.The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results: visual investigation: eleven screws (hereinafter called screw "a" - "k") with broken off tip and deformation arrived for investigation.The broken off tips were not enclosed.We made a microscopic investigation of all eleven screws.The rest of the thread of screw a is partially damaged.The fracture surface of screw a shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw a shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw b shows little damages.The fracture surface of screw b shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw b shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw c is in a good condition.The fracture surface of screw c shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw c shows significant wear and deformation.The rest of the thread of screw d is in a good condition.The fracture surface of screw d shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw d shows only minor wear.The rest of the thread of screw e is soiled and damaged.The fracture surface of screw e shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw e shows only minor deformation.The rest of the thread of screw f is damaged and deformed.The tip of screw f is not broken only deformed.The phillips head of screw f shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw g is damaged and deformed.The fracture surface of screw g shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw g shows only minor wear and is in a good condition.The rest of the thread of screw h is in a good condition.The tip exhibit no damages or deformations.The phillips head of screw h shows significant wear and deformation.The rest of the thread of screw i is soiled but in a good condition.The tip exhibit no damages or deformations.The phillips head of screw i shows significant wear.The rest of the thread of screw j is in a good condition.The fracture surface of screw j shows the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips head of screw j shows significant wear and deformation.The rest of the thread of screw k shows minor deformation.The tip of screw k is not broken only deformed.The phillips head of screw k shows minor wear.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for the available lot number and were found to be according to our specifications valid at the time of production.Review of the complaint history revealed that 5 similar complaints have been filed against products from this batch number.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level ((b)(4)) according to din en iso (b)(4) is still acceptable.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CRANIOPLATE 1.5 SCR.MAG.CROSS L:4MM
Common Device Name
CRANIAL FIXATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
Manufacturer Contact
christian von der grün
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
MDR Report Key12920758
Report Number9610612-2021-00760
Device Sequence Number5271571
Product Code JEY
UDI-Device Identifier04038653463671
UDI-Public4038653463671
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K060492
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFM921T
Device Catalogue NumberFM921T
Device Lot Number52584299
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/15/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/27/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/30/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/02/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/29/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-