Model Number FM921T |
Device Problem
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to aesculap ag that a cranioplate 1.5 scr.Mag.Cross l:4mm (part # fm921t) was used during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the screw was broken.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the event.Although requested, additional information has not been made available.The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation results: visual investigation: 331 screws with broken off tip and deformations arrived for investigation.The broken off tips were not enclosed.Investigation was carried out visually and microscopically.All screws show damage.These are pronounced to different degrees on all screws.They are in detail: damaged threads, damaged phillips screw heads, broken screw tips and deformations.The fracture surface of the broken off tips show the typical signs of a screw that was torn off by excessive torque.The phillips heads show significant wear and deformation.Batch history review: due to the fact that no lot number was provided, a review of the device history records for the complained device is not possible.Review of the complaint history revealed that no similar complaints have been filed against products from this batch number.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level (severity 5(10) x probability of occurrence 7(10)) according to din en iso 14971 is still acceptable.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|