| Model Number |
72404274 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Mechanical Problem (1384); Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/29/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported device performance allegation cannot be confirmed.Based on the information available, the cause that contributed to the reported event cannot be established; a conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had the inflatable penile prosthesis removed as the device malfunctioned due to fluid leak from multiple holes in the cylinder.A new inflatable penile prosthesis consisting of cylinders, pump, and reservoir was implanted.The procedure was successfully completed and the patient fully recovered.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation summary: with all the available information, boston scientific concludes, based on analysis results, the cause that contributed to the mechanical issue and fluid loss was confirmed.Device history record review (dhr): the device history record review (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications device technical analysis: upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this device was thoroughly analyzed.The ams700 ipp cylinders were visually inspected, leak tested and examined using a microscope.Both cylinders had wear at folds in the cylinder bodies.Both cylinders had holes.Cylinder 1 had multiple holes at the corner of the folds in the cylinder body with leaks present.Cylinder 2 had a hole which led to a leak in the cylinder body.The hole was the result of a sharp instrument damage which most likely occurred during the explant surgery.The kink resistant tubing (krt) of cylinder 2 was worn down to the filament.Both cylinders were not pressure tested due to the leaks that were identified.The identified fluid leak was also the most likely cause of the reported mechanical issue, as the device would not be functional after the system fluid was lost.Product analysis confirmed the reported events.Labeling review: a labeling review found no evidence of device off-label use or failure to follow instructions.The reported events also do not contain an allegation against the labeling.Investigation conclusion: based on this investigation a clear probable cause for the event was established; therefore, the investigation conclusion code of caused traced to component failure was chosen, based on the identified failure of the cylinder and fluid leak.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had the inflatable penile prosthesis removed as the device malfunctioned due to fluid leak from multiple holes in the cylinder.A new inflatable penile prosthesis consisting of cylinders, pump, and reservoir was implanted.The procedure was successfully completed and the patient fully recovered.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had the inflatable penile prosthesis removed as the device malfunctioned due to fluid leak from multiple holes in the cylinder.A new inflatable penile prosthesis consisting of cylinders, pump, and reservoir was implanted.The procedure was successfully completed and the patient fully recovered.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: device evaluation of the pump and reservoir added.H6: evaluation codes investigation summary: with all the available information, boston scientific concludes, based on analysis results, the cause that contributed to the mechanical issue and fluid loss was confirmed.Device history record review (dhr): the device history record review (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications device technical analysis: upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this device was thoroughly analyzed.The ams700 ipp cylinders were visually inspected, leak tested and examined using a microscope.Both cylinders had wear at folds in the cylinder bodies.Both cylinders had holes.Cylinder 1 had multiple holes at the corner of the folds in the cylinder body with leaks present.Cylinder 2 had a hole which led to a leak in the cylinder body.The hole was the result of a sharp instrument damage which most likely occurred during the explant surgery.The kink resistant tubing (krt) of cylinder 2 was worn down to the filament.Both cylinders were not pressure tested due to the leaks that were identified.The identified fluid leak was also the most likely cause of the reported mechanical issue, as the device would not be functional after the system fluid was lost.Product analysis confirmed the reported events.The spherical reservoir was visually inspected, leak tested and examined using a microscope; no visual damages were found upon inspection.The reservoir passed all tests performed.The (ms) pump was leak tested, visually inspected, examined using a microscope, and functionally tested.The pump (krt) was worn down to the filament.The ms pump was functionally tested and failed the 8lb activation test (2) and therefore required more than 8lbs of force to activate.Product analysis concluded these activation issues could affect the functionality of the device.Product analysis identified device malfunction with the returned pump.Labeling review: a labeling review found no evidence of device off-label use or failure to follow instructions.The reported events also do not contain an allegation against the labeling.Investigation conclusion: based on this investigation a investigation conclusion code of caused traced to component failure was chosen, based on the identified failure of the cylinder and fluid leak.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|