| Catalog Number |
0112710 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
01/27/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) (x3) on (b)(6) 2000 (x2) and (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against bard mesh (bard flat mesh) (x2).Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) (x3) on (b)(6) 2000 (x2) and (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against bard mesh (bard flat mesh) (x2).Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2000 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernias thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard pre-shaped mesh with keyhole (device 1 and 2).Per op notes, ¿a direct hernia sac was noted on right inguinal region and dissected away.A bard pre-shaped mesh with keyhole (device 1) was placed on right side and stapled.A large direct hernia sac was noted on left inguinal region and dissected away.A bard mesh pre-shaped with keyhole (device 2) was placed on left side and stapled.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated recurrent right inguinal hernia with pain thereby underwent open repair with partial excision of bard pre-shaped mesh with keyhole (device 1) and implant of bard flat mesh (device 3).Per op notes, ¿multiple adhesions from prior repair were taken down.Scar tissues were excised.Pieces of prior mesh (device 1) with staples were noted and excised.The indirect hernia sac was noted and excised.A bard flat mesh (device 3) was placed and sutured medially to the pubic tubercle.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, ¿a large direct hernia sac was noted and reduced.A synthetic mesh was placed and sutured.¿ (note: the prior meshes (device 3) are not visualized during this procedure).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.This supplemental emdr represents the bard pre-shaped mesh with keyhole (device 1).Additional supplemental emdr and an emdr were submitted to represent the bard pre-shaped mesh with keyhole (device 2) and bard flat mesh (device 3).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|