• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION; NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION; NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK_NAV_SYS
Device Problem Imprecision (1307)
Patient Problem Numbness (2415)
Event Date 09/23/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Lu, s., yang, k., lu, c., wei, p., gan, z., zhu, z., tan, h.(2021, february 17).O-arm navigation for sacroiliac screw placement in the treatment for posterior pelvic ring injury.International orthopaedics.Retrieved december 6, 2021, from https://link.S pringer.Com/article/10.1007/s00264-020-04832-2.Summary purpose: this study aims to investigate the application value of o-arm navigation system in sacroiliac screw placement for the treatment of unstable pelvic ring injury.Methods a total of 40 patients (mean age = 30.75 ± 14.99 years, 25 males, 15 females) were included.From january 2016 to july 2018, 40 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury treated in our hospital were included.Of them, 19 patients underwent o-arm navigation for screw placement (o-arm group) while the other 21 received c-arm fluoroscopy guidance (c-arm group) for sacroiliac screw placement.Intraoperative outcomes and the outcome of screw placement were compared between groups.The quality of radiological images was assessed by matta¿s radiological outcome grade.The outcome of complex pelvic fracture treatment was evaluated by majeed functional score.Results: all demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups.Compared with the c-arm groups, the o-arm group had a shorter surgery time (33.19 ± 3.14 vs.48.35 ± 4.38 min, p <(><<)> 0.001), a higher overall good outcome ¿excellent + good¿ rate of screw placement (95.45% vs.73.91%, p <(><<)> 0.05), and a significantly higher majeed functional score better outcome of complex pelvic fracture treatment at 1 and 3 months postoperation (both p <(><<)> 0.05).Conclusion: our results demonstrated that o-arm navigation system is feasible and safe for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury and can effectively improve the accuracy and safety of sacroiliac screw placement, shorten the operation time, and help rapid postoperative functional recovery.Reported event nineteen patients underwent a sacroiliac screw placement to address an unstable pelvic ring injury.It was reported that one patient had to undergo a screw revision due to screw malposition.The screw clearly penetrated the sacral pedicle, more than one-fourth of the screw diameter.This issue was attributed to the surgical assistant accidentally hitting the reference frame, leading to image drift, and then screw malposition.It was also noted that there were two cases of numbness and predehydration.These issues were resolved by symptomatic treatments, such as hormone and nutritional nerve treatment for three months.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was not included in the journal entry.This value reflects the average age of the patients who underwent a sacroiliac screw placement as specific patients could not be identified.This value reflects the majority gender of the patients who underwent a sacroiliac screw placement as specific patients could not be identified.The article did not provide the date of the procedure.The event date provided is the accepted date.The article citation is included.The serial number was not provided in the journal article.Udi not available for this system.No 510k provided as system is unknown.No evaluation was performed as the event was reported as a literature article.Device manufacturing date is unavailable.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION
Type of Device
NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key12934359
MDR Text Key287181733
Report Number1723170-2021-02820
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HAW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/06/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/06/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK_NAV_SYS
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_NAV_SYS
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age31 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-