|
|
| Model Number |
286725020 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/08/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the patient underwent the posterior spinal fusion (l3-l5) on an unknown date.The surgery was completed successfully.On (b)(6) 2021, the prolongation of posterior spinal fusion (l1-s) for the lumbar spinal stenosis was performed.During the screw (l3/right) removal, the hexlobe driver shaft was stripped.Therefore, removal was attempted using viper universal ply driver.However, the driver's tip broke.The screw was removed as per surgical techniques.The broken fragments were removed from the body.The surgery was completed successfully within thirty (30) minutes delay.Patient outcome is reported as stable.No further information is available.This report is for one (1) viper2 t20 hexlobe driver shaft.This is report 1 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: a review of the receiving inspection (ri) for viper2 t20 hexlobe driver shaf was conducted identifying that lot number so2033907 was released in a single batch.Batch1: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on march 16, 2018 with no discrepancies.As a result, the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.The product was returned to us customer quality cq for evaluation.The us cq team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that tip of viper2 t20 hexlobe driver shaf was stripped.No other defects were found with the device.The dimensional inspection was not performed due to the post manufacturing damage.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed stripped condition of viper2 t20 hexlobe driver shaf.While no definitive root cause could be determined, it is probable that the tip of viper2 t20 hexlobe driver shaf got stripped due to the application of unintended forces.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed? the following drawing reflecting the current and manufacture revision was reviewed: viper2 t20 hexlobe driver device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|