| Catalog Number |
0112650 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of two unspecified bard meshes (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 1998 and (b)(6) 2000.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.This supplemental emdr represents the bard flat mesh (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of two unspecified bard meshes (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 1998 and (b)(6) 2000.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 1998 - patient was diagnosed with ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of bard flat mesh (device 1).Per op notes, "the previously used ventral midline incision was made, a bard flat mesh (device 1) was sutured in place using prolene sutures." (b)(6) 2000 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of bard flat mesh (device 2).Per op notes, "the previously used midline incision was utilized.A portion of the marlex mesh (device 1) in the superior aspect appeared to be pulled loose from the fascia.A bard flat mesh (device 2) was placed to the defect along with the old mesh (device 1) using prolene sutures.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|